Back to list
The Manual Coding Retreat: Why One AI Engineer is Coding Without LLMs for Three Months
Industry NewsSoftware EngineeringAI AgentsDeveloper Experience

The Manual Coding Retreat: Why One AI Engineer is Coding Without LLMs for Three Months

Miguel Conner, an experienced AI engineer from Aily Labs, has embarked on a three-month coding retreat in Brooklyn, New York, to focus on programming without the heavy reliance on AI tools. Despite his background in building AI agents and knowledge graphs, Conner argues that manual coding serves two critical functions: expressing intent and deeply learning a codebase. Having spent six weeks on this retreat as of March 2026, he reflects on the transition from using state-of-the-art models like DeepSeek R1 and Llama 3 to the traditional 'hand-coded' approach. This experiment comes at a time when many in the industry suggest that programming is a 'solved problem' due to the rise of AI agents and automated workflows.

Hacker News

Key Takeaways

  • Intentional Disconnection: Miguel Conner is spending three months coding 'the old way' to rediscover the nuances of the craft.
  • Deep Industry Experience: The author previously led projects at Aily Labs, building web search agents and knowledge graphs long before major industry releases from Anthropic and OpenAI.
  • The Dual Nature of Coding: Manual coding is identified as a process of both writing desired logic and actively learning the underlying codebase.
  • Contrarian Timing: This retreat occurs in early 2026, a period where many successful programmers claim that AI has effectively solved the problem of programming.

In-Depth Analysis

From AI Pioneer to Manual Practitioner

Miguel Conner’s decision to step away from AI-assisted development is particularly notable given his professional pedigree. At Aily Labs in Barcelona, he was at the forefront of the AI revolution, developing internal web search agents in early 2024—months before Anthropic published its influential 'Building Effective AI Agents' article and a full year before OpenAI’s DeepResearch. His work involved leading journal clubs to dissect the architectures of open-source models like DeepSeek R1, Ai2’s Olmo 3, and Meta’s Llama 3. This deep technical understanding of how LLMs are built and trained provides a unique perspective on why one might choose to temporarily abandon them.

The Hidden Costs of AI Agents

While using coding agents like Cursor and various LLMs, Conner identified a significant shift in the development process. He posits that traditional coding 'by hand' involves two simultaneous actions: the expression of what the programmer wants to create and the cognitive process of learning the codebase. The analysis suggests that while AI agents can handle the 'writing' aspect efficiently, they may disrupt the 'learning' aspect. By spending three months in Brooklyn focusing on manual input, Conner aims to reclaim the element of the craft that requires a deep, unmediated connection with the code, challenging the contemporary narrative that programming is a solved problem.

Industry Impact

This narrative highlights a growing tension within the software engineering industry as of 2026. As AI agents become more sophisticated, there is an emerging debate regarding the loss of 'codebase intimacy' and the long-term effects on developer expertise. Conner’s retreat serves as a case study for the 'craftsmanship' movement in software, suggesting that even as SOTA (State-of-the-Art) models become more capable, the human element of understanding and learning through manual labor remains a vital component of high-level engineering. It raises questions about whether the efficiency gained by AI comes at the cost of deep architectural comprehension.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Why did Miguel Conner decide to start a coding retreat in Brooklyn?

Conner moved to Brooklyn for a mix of personal reasons and a professional desire to focus on coding without AI for three months. He wanted to explore the 'old way' of programming at a time when the industry increasingly views coding as a solved problem.

Question: What was Conner's experience with AI prior to this retreat?

He spent two years at Aily Labs building AI agents, including early web search tools and knowledge graphs. He also led a journal club focused on the training and tradeoffs of models like Llama 3 and DeepSeek R1.

Question: What does Conner believe is lost when using a coding agent?

He suggests that manual coding allows a developer to learn the codebase while writing. Using an agent often focuses only on the output, potentially bypassing the deep learning process that occurs when writing code by hand.

Related News

Stripe Acquires OpenRouter: Moving Beyond 'The Singularity' to Practical AI Infrastructure
Industry News

Stripe Acquires OpenRouter: Moving Beyond 'The Singularity' to Practical AI Infrastructure

Stripe, the global payments giant, has officially acquired OpenRouter, a startup specializing in the routing of prompts across various artificial intelligence models. While Stripe's public justification for the acquisition centers on the philosophical concept of 'the singularity,' industry observers and the original report suggest a more grounded and potent motivation. This strategic move highlights a significant shift in the AI landscape, where infrastructure for model orchestration is becoming a critical asset for financial technology leaders. By integrating OpenRouter’s capabilities, Stripe positions itself at the center of AI model interoperability, moving beyond mere payment processing into the fundamental layer of how businesses interact with diverse AI ecosystems. The acquisition underscores the growing necessity for efficient prompt management and the strategic value of controlling the gateway between users and multiple AI providers.

OpenAI and Anthropic Compete to Provide Superior Privacy Protections for Enterprise Data
Industry News

OpenAI and Anthropic Compete to Provide Superior Privacy Protections for Enterprise Data

A significant competition is emerging between AI industry leaders OpenAI and Anthropic. The two companies are currently vying to establish themselves as the primary provider of robust privacy protections for enterprise customer data. This rivalry highlights a strategic shift in the AI landscape, where the security and confidentiality of corporate information have become central to market leadership. As both firms attempt to outmaneuver each other, the focus remains on which entity can offer the most comprehensive safeguards for sensitive data, reflecting the growing demand for secure AI solutions within the business sector.

Cognition CEO Refutes Claims of SpaceX Acquisition Attempt Amid Growing Enterprise AI Competition
Industry News

Cognition CEO Refutes Claims of SpaceX Acquisition Attempt Amid Growing Enterprise AI Competition

Cognition's CEO has officially denied reports suggesting that SpaceX attempted to acquire the AI coding startup. This development comes at a time when SpaceX is actively expanding its footprint in the artificial intelligence sector, having recently acquired the AI-powered code editor Cursor. The move highlights SpaceX's strategic push to compete with established AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic. While the rumored acquisition of Cognition—known for its AI software engineering capabilities—would have signaled a massive consolidation in the coding assistant market, the denial clarifies the current independence of the startup. The situation underscores the intensifying race for enterprise AI dominance and the high stakes involved in securing top-tier AI technology to rival industry leaders.