Back to list
Comprehensive Collection of Leaked System Prompts for Claude Fable 5, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.5 Surfaces on GitHub
Industry NewsAI SafetyPrompt EngineeringGitHub

Comprehensive Collection of Leaked System Prompts for Claude Fable 5, GPT 5.5, and Gemini 3.5 Surfaces on GitHub

A new GitHub repository titled "system_prompts_leaks" has emerged as a significant resource for the AI community, offering a detailed collection of system prompts extracted from the world's leading artificial intelligence models. Maintained by user asgeirtj, the repository includes internal instructions for high-profile models such as Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, OpenAI’s ChatGPT 5.5 Thinking and GPT 5.5 Instant, and Google’s Gemini 3.5 Flash and 3.1 Pro. The leak also extends to specialized AI tools including Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Perplexity. These system prompts provide a rare glimpse into the operational constraints, behavioral guidelines, and safety protocols established by AI developers. The repository is reportedly updated on a regular basis, serving as a central hub for researchers and developers interested in the underlying logic of modern large language models.

GitHub Trending

Key Takeaways

  • A GitHub repository has compiled leaked system prompts from major AI providers including Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google.
  • The collection includes prompts for next-generation models like Claude Fable 5, GPT 5.5 Thinking, and Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • The repository also covers AI-integrated development tools such as Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and VS Code.
  • The project is maintained by user asgeirtj and is subject to regular updates as new prompts are extracted.

In-Depth Analysis

Comprehensive Model Coverage and Versioning

The "system_prompts_leaks" repository represents one of the most extensive public collections of internal AI instructions to date. It spans across multiple industry leaders, notably featuring Anthropic's latest iterations like Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, alongside specialized versions like Claude Code and Claude Design. The inclusion of these specific versions suggests a deep dive into the evolving architecture of the Claude ecosystem. OpenAI's presence is equally significant, with prompts for ChatGPT 5.5 Thinking and GPT 5.5 Instant being made public. This distinction between "Thinking" and "Instant" models highlights the different operational logic applied to models optimized for reasoning versus those optimized for speed. Google’s ecosystem is also well-represented, featuring Gemini 3.5 Flash, 3.1 Pro, and the previously less-documented "Antigravity" model. This breadth allows for a comparative look at how different organizations structure their model's foundational behavior and how these instructions change across different model tiers.

Specialized Tool Integration and Developer Ecosystems

Beyond general-purpose large language models (LLMs), the leak extends significantly into the realm of AI-powered productivity and coding tools. System prompts for Cursor, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, and Perplexity are included in the repository. These prompts are critical because they define how AI interacts with complex environments like codebases, real-time search results, and integrated development environment (IDE) interfaces. By examining these instructions, developers can gain insights into the specific constraints and "personalities" assigned to these tools to ensure they remain helpful and safe within their respective environments. For instance, the prompts for VS Code and Copilot likely contain specific instructions on how to handle code suggestions and maintain context over long files, while Perplexity’s prompts would focus on the synthesis of search data and citation accuracy.

The Role of Continuous Updates in Prompt Extraction

A notable aspect of this repository is its commitment to regular updates. As AI companies frequently update their models and the system prompts that guide them, a static leak would quickly become obsolete. The maintainer, asgeirtj, indicates that the repository is updated periodically to reflect the current state of these models. This ongoing effort suggests a persistent community interest in "prompt leaking" or extraction techniques. It also indicates that despite the efforts of companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google to secure their internal instructions, these prompts remain accessible to those using advanced extraction methods. This continuous cycle of updates makes the repository a living document of the current state of AI steering and alignment.

Industry Impact

The public availability of these system prompts has significant implications for the AI industry. For researchers, it provides a transparent window into the safety guardrails and operational logic that companies use to steer model behavior. This can lead to better academic understanding of AI alignment and safety. However, for the companies involved, such leaks highlight the ongoing challenge of prompt security. If internal instructions are easily extracted, it may lead to more sophisticated "prompt injection" attacks where users attempt to bypass the very guardrails revealed in these leaks. Furthermore, this repository may force AI developers to rethink how they protect internal instructions, potentially leading to a shift toward more transparent, open-source-style documentation of model guidelines, or conversely, more robust technical measures to prevent extraction. The leak also levels the playing field for smaller developers who can now study the prompt engineering techniques used by industry giants to improve their own AI implementations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are system prompts and why are they important?

System prompts are the foundational instructions provided to an AI model by its developers before a user interaction begins. They define the model's role, limitations, tone, and safety guidelines. They are important because they act as the "constitution" for the AI, steering its behavior and ensuring it stays within defined operational boundaries.

Question: Which specific models are included in the system_prompts_leaks repository?

The repository includes prompts from a wide range of models, including Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, OpenAI's ChatGPT 5.5 Thinking and GPT 5.5 Instant, Google's Gemini 3.5 Flash and 3.1 Pro, xAI's Grok, and specialized tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Perplexity.

Question: Is the extraction of these prompts authorized by the AI companies?

No, these prompts are typically extracted through various techniques without the explicit authorization of the developers. They are considered internal configurations, and their public release on platforms like GitHub is usually the result of independent research or prompt extraction efforts by the community.

Related News

SpaceX Reports Q3 Revenue Surge to $14.6 Billion Driven by Rapid AI and Connectivity Growth
Industry News

SpaceX Reports Q3 Revenue Surge to $14.6 Billion Driven by Rapid AI and Connectivity Growth

SpaceX revealed remarkable financial results for the third quarter, generating $14.6 billion in total revenue. This represents an impressive 161 percent year-over-year increase, propelled by expansion in its Super Intelligence (SI) business segment alongside accelerating momentum within its Connectivity division. While the company's dedicated Space division recorded a modest operating loss of $7 million, the Connectivity segment demonstrated strong profitability, delivering operating income reported at $2.4 billion before disclosures cut off. The newly highlighted Super Intelligence unit emphasizes an expanding operational footprint beyond conventional launch capabilities, marking a significant transition where artificial intelligence applications and global connectivity infrastructure serve as the principal financial catalysts offsetting traditional launch operations.

CoreWeave Debt Falls Into Distressed Territory as AI Industry Faces Growing Infrastructure Credit Concerns
Industry News

CoreWeave Debt Falls Into Distressed Territory as AI Industry Faces Growing Infrastructure Credit Concerns

CoreWeave experienced a turbulent week as its corporate bonds slid into distressed territory, defined by financial markets as yields demanding a premium of at least 1,000 basis points over comparable government debt. The sharp repricing of CoreWeave's debt highlights mounting unease among fixed-income investors regarding the debt-financed expansion underpinning the artificial intelligence sector. Highlighting this shift, prominent investor Chamath Palihapitiya publicly questioned whether the aggressive capital expenditure and private credit supporting the AI buildout may constitute a financial bubble. Because AI compute providers rely heavily on debt to acquire expensive infrastructure, rising risk premiums for a bellwether like CoreWeave carry far-reaching consequences for financing costs, capital accessibility, and project valuations across the wider technology landscape.

Industry News

OpenAI Advances ChatGPT Coding Capabilities for Low-Resource Programming Languages, SQLite, and Enterprise COBOL Migration

OpenAI has officially announced new initiatives aimed at advancing ChatGPT's coding proficiency across low-resource programming languages. According to the update published on the OpenAI Blog, the company is introducing dedicated evaluations designed to rigorously test model performance on real-world software engineering tasks, SQLite implementation, and COBOL migration. While modern artificial intelligence coding assistants have historically concentrated on mainstream development environments like Python and JavaScript, low-resource and legacy languages present unique challenges due to sparse training datasets and complex operational requirements. By focusing on targeted evaluation benchmarks for software engineering workflows, relational database engines, and mission-critical legacy migrations, OpenAI addresses vital technical domains that underpin enterprise IT architecture. This structured analysis examines the scope of OpenAI's announcement, the importance of low-resource language benchmarks, and what these developments mean for the broader artificial intelligence and software maintenance ecosystems.