Back to List
Industry NewsAIIntellectual PropertyGeopolitics

Anthropic Accuses DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of Industrial-Scale Claude Model Theft Using 24,000 Fake Accounts

Anthropic has publicly accused three prominent Chinese AI laboratories—DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax—of orchestrating large-scale campaigns to extract capabilities from its Claude models. The San Francisco-based AI company alleges that these labs collectively generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fraudulent accounts, violating Anthropic's terms of service and regional access restrictions. Anthropic describes these campaigns as the most concrete public evidence of foreign competitors systematically using 'distillation' to bypass years of research and significant investment. The company warned that these campaigns are increasing in intensity and sophistication, requiring urgent, coordinated action from industry, policymakers, and the global AI community. This disclosure escalates tensions between American and Chinese AI developers and is linked to the ongoing debate in Washington regarding export controls on advanced AI chips, a policy Anthropic has actively supported.

VentureBeat

Anthropic dropped a bombshell on the artificial intelligence industry Monday, publicly accusing three prominent Chinese AI laboratories — DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax — of orchestrating coordinated, industrial-scale campaigns to siphon capabilities from its Claude models using tens of thousands of fraudulent accounts. The San Francisco-based company said the three labs collectively generated more than 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fake accounts, all in violation of Anthropic's terms of service and regional access restrictions. The campaigns, Anthropic said, are the most concrete and detailed public evidence to date of a practice that has haunted Silicon Valley for months: foreign competitors systematically using a technique called distillation to leapfrog years of research and billions of dollars in investment.

"These campaigns are growing in intensity and sophistication," Anthropic wrote in a technical blog post published Monday. "The window to act is narrow, and the threat extends beyond any single company or region. Addressing it will require rapid, coordinated action among industry players, policymakers, and the global AI community." The disclosure marks a dramatic escalation in the simmering tensions between American and Chinese AI developers — and it arrives at a moment when Washington is actively debating whether to tighten or loosen export controls on the advanced chips that power AI training. Anthropic, led by CEO Dario Amodei, has been among the most vocal advocates for restricting chip sales to China, and the company explicitly connected Monday's revelations to that policy fight. To understand what Anthropic alleges, it helps to understand what distillation actually is — and how it evolved from an academic curiosity into the most contentious issue in the global AI race. At its core, distillation is a process of

Related News

Meituan Showcases AI Innovations at ACL 2026: Advancing LLM Evaluation, Reasoning, and Generative Recommendations
Industry News

Meituan Showcases AI Innovations at ACL 2026: Advancing LLM Evaluation, Reasoning, and Generative Recommendations

The Meituan technical team has achieved significant recognition at the ACL 2026 conference, with six papers accepted into this premier international forum for computational linguistics and natural language processing. These research contributions span critical frontiers in the AI landscape, including large language model (LLM) capability evaluation, complex process reasoning, and the optimization of competition-level mathematical thinking. Additionally, the papers explore advancements in reinforcement learning and the evolution of generative recommendation systems. By addressing these diverse technical directions, Meituan is actively shaping a new paradigm for generative AI, focusing on bridging the gap between theoretical research and practical industrial applications. This selection of papers highlights Meituan's commitment to enhancing model intelligence and reasoning capabilities to solve sophisticated real-world problems.

Meituan LongCat Releases General 365: A New Benchmark for AI Reasoning Evaluation
Industry News

Meituan LongCat Releases General 365: A New Benchmark for AI Reasoning Evaluation

Meituan's LongCat team has officially launched General 365, a rigorous new benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large language models. In a comprehensive test of 26 mainstream models, the results revealed a significant performance gap in the industry. Even the top-performing model, Gemini 3 Pro, achieved an accuracy rate of only 62.8%. Furthermore, the vast majority of the models tested failed to reach the 60% threshold, which is considered the passing mark for this evaluation. This release sets a challenging new standard for AI development, highlighting that complex reasoning remains a major hurdle for even the most advanced artificial intelligence systems currently available.

Managing AI-Driven Development: Meituan’s Strategy for Refactoring 310,000 Lines of Code Using Agent Evaluation Logic
Industry News

Managing AI-Driven Development: Meituan’s Strategy for Refactoring 310,000 Lines of Code Using Agent Evaluation Logic

Meituan's technical team has shared a comprehensive analysis of their experience refactoring 310,000 lines of code in an environment where over 90% of code is AI-generated. The core insight is that while AI significantly accelerates code production, it can also amplify technical debt and systemic chaos without proper constraints. To mitigate this, the team adopted an 'Agent evaluation' mindset to manage AI coding. By implementing a framework consisting of technical debt sorting, rule construction, standardized operating procedures (SOPs), and a Pre-PR (Pull Request) mechanism, they successfully transformed large-scale refactoring from a high-cost, specialized effort into a continuous, daily iterative process. This approach ensures that AI remains a productive tool rather than a source of unmanaged complexity.