Back to list
Industry NewsAIIntellectual PropertyGeopolitics

Anthropic Accuses DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of Industrial-Scale Claude Model Theft Using 24,000 Fake Accounts

Anthropic has publicly accused three prominent Chinese AI laboratories—DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax—of orchestrating large-scale campaigns to extract capabilities from its Claude models. The San Francisco-based AI company alleges that these labs collectively generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fraudulent accounts, violating Anthropic's terms of service and regional access restrictions. Anthropic describes these campaigns as the most concrete public evidence of foreign competitors systematically using 'distillation' to bypass years of research and significant investment. The company warned that these campaigns are increasing in intensity and sophistication, requiring urgent, coordinated action from industry, policymakers, and the global AI community. This disclosure escalates tensions between American and Chinese AI developers and is linked to the ongoing debate in Washington regarding export controls on advanced AI chips, a policy Anthropic has actively supported.

VentureBeat

Anthropic dropped a bombshell on the artificial intelligence industry Monday, publicly accusing three prominent Chinese AI laboratories — DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax — of orchestrating coordinated, industrial-scale campaigns to siphon capabilities from its Claude models using tens of thousands of fraudulent accounts. The San Francisco-based company said the three labs collectively generated more than 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fake accounts, all in violation of Anthropic's terms of service and regional access restrictions. The campaigns, Anthropic said, are the most concrete and detailed public evidence to date of a practice that has haunted Silicon Valley for months: foreign competitors systematically using a technique called distillation to leapfrog years of research and billions of dollars in investment.

"These campaigns are growing in intensity and sophistication," Anthropic wrote in a technical blog post published Monday. "The window to act is narrow, and the threat extends beyond any single company or region. Addressing it will require rapid, coordinated action among industry players, policymakers, and the global AI community." The disclosure marks a dramatic escalation in the simmering tensions between American and Chinese AI developers — and it arrives at a moment when Washington is actively debating whether to tighten or loosen export controls on the advanced chips that power AI training. Anthropic, led by CEO Dario Amodei, has been among the most vocal advocates for restricting chip sales to China, and the company explicitly connected Monday's revelations to that policy fight. To understand what Anthropic alleges, it helps to understand what distillation actually is — and how it evolved from an academic curiosity into the most contentious issue in the global AI race. At its core, distillation is a process of

Related News

AI-Driven Security Advancements and the Potential for Law Enforcement to Go Dark in the Digital Age
Industry News

AI-Driven Security Advancements and the Potential for Law Enforcement to Go Dark in the Digital Age

Following the Usenix Security conference, a new concern has emerged regarding the intersection of artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. While AI is often viewed as a tool for potential threats, there is a growing worry that AI-driven advancements could make software "too secure." This shift poses a significant challenge for U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies, potentially leading to a "going dark" scenario where traditional surveillance and hacking capabilities are rendered obsolete. By examining the evolution of electronic surveillance—from the voice-call era of the early 2000s to the data-rich environment of modern smartphones—this analysis explores how AI-enhanced security might disrupt the current balance between law enforcement access and digital privacy, impacting both national security and the broader field of computer security.

Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indosat, and NVIDIA Launch Indonesia’s First University-Based AI Technology Center
Industry News

Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indosat, and NVIDIA Launch Indonesia’s First University-Based AI Technology Center

Indonesia has officially inaugurated its first university-based artificial intelligence center, the UGM Indosat NVIDIA AI Technology Center (NVAITC), located at Universitas Gadjah Mada in Yogyakarta. This landmark initiative is a collaborative effort involving the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi), Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison, NVIDIA, and UGM. Established as part of the broader Indonesia’s AI Center of Excellence framework, the center is dedicated to developing local AI talent and securing the nation's digital future. By integrating industry-leading technology from NVIDIA and the telecommunications infrastructure of Indosat with UGM's academic environment, the NVAITC aims to foster innovation and provide a dedicated space for AI research and development within the Indonesian higher education system.

Meta Releases Glimmer AI Model as Mark Zuckerberg Advocates for Open Access to Artificial Intelligence
Industry News

Meta Releases Glimmer AI Model as Mark Zuckerberg Advocates for Open Access to Artificial Intelligence

Meta has officially released Glimmer, a new open-weight AI model designed to be downloaded and executed on personal hardware. This launch represents a strategic move toward decentralized AI, as highlighted in a concurrent letter from CEO Mark Zuckerberg. In his message, Zuckerberg argues that artificial intelligence should be "for everyone" rather than being monopolized by a small group of elite laboratories. However, the release also underscores a dual-track strategy at Meta: while Glimmer is open to the public, the company’s more advanced and powerful model, Muse Spark, remains restricted behind proprietary APIs. This development highlights the ongoing industry debate regarding the balance between open-source contributions and the retention of high-performance proprietary technology.